Celeron vs Pentium?
Brought to you by The CPU Scorecard - Benchmarks & News, Prices & Reviews
The CPU Scorecard Home PageCPU FAQ List Benchmarks Comparisons Odds 'n' Ends Other Scores Overclocking Processors Shopping Upgrades
[ The CPU Scorecard > Processors > Celeron vs Pentium? ] Previous Next

Latest CPU News
Compare CPU Speeds
Compare Computer Prices
Compare CPU Features

Intel CPU's
Transmeta CPU's

Ask the CPU Scorekeeper

Compare & Shop for
a NEW Computer
or Accessories
Buy or Sell
a USED Computer
or Accessories
Subscribe to our FREE newsletter for the latest CPU releases, reviews, and rankings!

Best multitasking CPU?
AMD Thunderbird serial number?
K6-2+ Not Just for Notebooks?
More Old CPU's?
CPU Temperature Limits?
AMD K6-2 400 vs Celeron 366?
Dual AMD CPU Support?
Athlon roadmap?
What about Dual Celerons?
Pentium-III vs K6-2?
Can I improve a K6-2 L2 cache?
Pentium-E? -B? -EB? What?
What is my CPU?
3D CPUs vs 3D graphics?
AMD K6 233 vs Cyrix MII 266?
K6-III FP performance?
Mac G3 450 score?
Is the AMD K6-2 3D?
Don't you like Intel processors?
Is a Celeron good enough?
Celeron vs Pentium?
AMD K6-2 vs Intel Celeron?
AMD K6 and Y2K?
Celeron vs P-II vs P-III?
Mobile P-II 333 vs Celeron 400?
What is L2 cache?


Dear CPU Scorekeeper

I have been trying to research the differences between the Celeron and the Pentium with regards to bottom line performance. The Intel site denotes quite a substantial difference, while other comparisons state the Celeron outperforms the Pentium-II.

My question is: What kinds of differences can I expect with regard to performance and ownership of the Celeron versus the Pentium-III? How does the Celeron-466 compare to the Pentium-450, for example?

- - Robert, September 1999

See the questionCPU Scorekeeper Responds

The main architectural differences between Celerons, Pentium-IIs and Pentium-IIIs can be found on our Intel Stats pages. The performance differences between the Celeron-466 and the PentiumIII-450 can be illustrated using our CPU Comparator.

In summary, the main differences between Celerons and Pentiums are in the areas of bus speed and L2 cache features. Both Pentium-II's and -III's ship with 512kB of secondary (L2) CPU instruction cache. This allows the CPU to store recently used instructions close by and is responsible for much of their high performance.

The Celerons that Intel first introduced as a low-cost CPU alternative (266 & 300MHz versions) were basically just Pentium-II's without any L2 cache at all. This deficiency really punished Celeron performance when compared to competitive AMD and Cyrix chips. In response, subsequent Celeron versions (300A and up) were provided with 128kB of L2 cache. Though only one-quarter the size of the Pentium cache, it was built to run at the full speed of the respective CPU, rather than at half-speed as in the Pentiums. Due to its higher manufacturing cost and technical issues, the larger Pentium cache memory has always been set to run at only half the speed of the CPU itself. For a full-speed L2 in a Pentium design, you need to get into Intel's (much more expensive) Xeon line.

What Intel plays down-- but nearly everyone knows-- is that the full-speed, quarter-size Celeron cache gives them almost the same performance as the half-speed, full-size cache gives Pentiums. Thus you'll find that, for most applications, Celerons rated at the same MHz will equal or better an equivalent Pentium-II, for a much lower price.

For example:

     Celeron @ 466MHz x 128kB L2 @ 466MHz =>
     Pentium-II @ 450MHz x 512kB L2 @ 225MHz

Pentium-III's are given an added boost with an inherently faster system bus speed (100MHz vs. 66MHz for the Celerons) and Intel's new SSE 3D instruction set. This combination of hardware and firmware enhancements gives Pentium-III's a significant edge over the Celeron's smaller cache and slower bus.

Additional discussion on L2 cache can be found here, while more technical issues can be found at Intel's developer web site.

Ask the CPU Scorekeeper


CPU Scorecard Quick Links
Compare CPU Speeds
Previous Next
The CPU Scorecard assumes no risk or liability for damage or loss due to the use of the information or advice provided here. All responses are based on the best available information at the time of writing. However, users of this information who wish to apply it to their computer situations do so at their own risk.
Top of page...CPU FAQ List Benchmarks Comparisons Odds 'n' Ends Other Scores Overclocking Processors Shopping Upgrades

We appreciate your feedback!

Copyright 1998-2003
MTekComputer Consulting Ltd
All rights reserved